Analysis on Electronic Health Record in the Contemporary Society Essays

Analysis on Electronic Health Record in the Contemporary Society Essays Analysis on Electronic Health Record in the Contemporary Society Paper Analysis on Electronic Health Record in the Contemporary Society Paper Due to advent of globalization and the immense occurrence of health problems in the contemporary society, healthcare practitioners divulge into a rather â€Å"modernized† conviction on how to improve the quality of their services for the benefit of humanity. Conceivably, the vision by which these practitioners are aided is a manifestation that the seeking towards the improvement of humanity’s way of living is constantly developing, hence, commencing on rather efficient means to cure and prevent manageable diseases which during the earlier decades were sought to be irrevocable (Gartee, 2006). In such delight, the mounting ability of technology on providing an efficient lifestyle is feasibly working on its utmost lead- the dilemma on paper works and compilation of medical patients has been conclusively time consuming thus, there appeared to be a remedy to such hassle- the electronic medical record. However, the access upon such records has been limited only to the hospital where the patient has been admitted and the other bureaus or offices which may need it in some circumstance were not given the â€Å"efficient† access to these records, making the â€Å"emergent† need time-consuming to comply. Consequently, the healthcare landscape came up with the revolutionized Electronic Health Record which enables the society to browse their medical record online, as well as with the other medical entities (JAHIMA, 2007). Current legislation surrounding its implementation In the year 2005, the United States of America gave a proposition to medical practitioners and hospitals as well that the pursuance of the project will not be of burden to them- giving them assurance that they are to grant the doctors with free electronic records system- which eventually triggered the publics consent on the feasibility and availability of the new system[1]. Consequently, several countries trusted the idea and have perceivably imposed the system and have catered such in a â€Å"shared† system[2] wherein the government and the hospitals both carve up their part in the maintenance of the EHR (Health Data Management, 2007). Hence, there appears to be a predicament on the case, since there are these critics who have observed a flaw in the program conveying the fact that the government is using this system and is allots a ‘larger’ amount compared to that calculated. There even involves politics in the imposition and various scrutiny on its ability to â€Å"develop life† and â€Å"change the future† of the healthcare arena constituted deliberative discussions- the standards in the system has not met the society’s expectation, although it has lessened the death rate in the country and the â€Å"donations† fraud[3]- seemingly float up in the whole gist of the story. [1] See nytimes.com/2005/07/21/health/21records.html?_r=2oref=sloginoref=slogin. [2] Ibid. healthdatamanagement.com/html/current/CurrentIssueStory.cfm?PostID=18930 [3] Ibid. http://emradvice.wordpress.com/category/ehr-legislation/